The Power of Embodied Contrast
- Eva Hund
- 7 days ago
- 3 min read
“The greater the tension, the greater is the potential. Great energy springs from a correspondingly great tension of opposites.” ~ C.G. Jung, Alchemical Studies, (CW 13, §154)
For years, I have been deeply fascinated by the Victorian New Woman. She resonated with me, as I began to struggle with these internal contradictions in my personal life. I now see that she embodies that tension between opposites and contrast that forms the basis of polarity work. The New Woman character (both literary and in real life) is constructed as both saint and transgressor, self‑sacrificing and self‑determining, acknowledged for spiritual depth but also socially disruptive.

How Does Inner Tension Show Up in Polarity?
Without a deeper understanding of contrast & tension, we often misread ourselves. We need a multi-dimensional approach in reading ourselves, as we would also read a literary character. We often look at tension as a sign of fragmentation, failure, or personality flaw. But deeper digging helps us see that there are important overlaps and functions in these traits.
In my research, I emphasize that the New Woman's “martyrdom” wasn’t just passive suffering, but a strategic attempt to access a world that denied her formal power (even in marriage, for example). If we fail to see that complexity in her choices, we misread the source of her agency. The examples that I have zoomed into actually show how these New Women were not necessarily always trapped in marriage, for example, but actually made a deliberate choice to use this for personal gain. This helps us re-read them, not as victims of a system, but as complex and self-actualized in their contradictions.
These examples show up in polarity practice, too:
self‑renunciation ↔ self‑realisation
spiritual sensitivity ↔ social resistance
seeming weakness ↔ actual influence
cultural compliance ↔ personal autonomy
These oppositions within the New Woman are not flaws in her design; these are the conditions that make her so powerful within that cultural context. Her identity emerged through that tension. And I think we are still navigating that tension (but as women, more clearly so). In this embodiment of opposites, the New Woman, to me, symbolizes what Jung describes as the generative force between opposing orientations. In order to understand this, we need to change our perspective on power and what it looks like.
How is Tension a Necessary Part of Development?
This is the same dynamic I now explore through the lens of polarity, especially within the context of relationships. Tension is a starting point for agency and development, and understanding these aspects of our psyche forms the basis of our Individuation process. The better we can manage to engage with our inner complexity, the further we can go in Individuation. We integrate (conflicted) aspects of our unconscious psyche and gain a clearer picture of who we are. This is how we discover how our different parts interact within us, and what they offer us as we develop. A side effect is that we also come to a new understanding of the people around us and can better interact with their own inner tensions, too.
Why This Matters Now
We tend to think of tension as something to eliminate- a sign that something is wrong. But tension is often the starting point for development.
We see this in real life all the time. It shows up when we need to be decisive and attuned all at once. One of our "inner parts" moves toward clarity and action, while the other leans toward reflection, or care. These qualities can feel mutually exclusive, yet the people who can hold both of these opposites simultaneously, without fully leaning into one side, are the ones who create the most movement. This is how tension itself becomes a source of intelligence.
The same is true in relationships. Flow doesn’t come from sameness; it comes from two people embodying different orientations. One person grounds, the other expands. Or one leans toward action, while the other person feels a stronger pull toward understanding. The interplay between these poles (not uniformity), is what results in deeper connection.
This is polarity in practice: the recognition that contrast is not a problem to solve, but a resource to work with. When we discover the strength of these complementary opposites, we can start to put those tendencies to better use.




Comments